Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.170/2022

Case between Rajitha et al vs P. Raman Nair et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Code No.
170
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Rajitha, filed a suit against the defendants, P. Raman Nair and others. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed as they stated it was not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed as they stated it was not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajitha
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o Late Santhosh Kumar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harish S. Kumar
Party Age
18
Relation
S/o Late Santhosh Kumar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abhirami S. Kumar
Party Age
17
Relation
D/o Late Santhosh Kumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Raman Nair
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o. Padmanabhan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o Viswan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o Manoj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. O. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mamatha S. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rejitha E.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed memo stating suit not pressed. Hence, suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won