Case Summary
Rajesh K. G. is the complainant alleging that Renjith Kumar B. issued a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The case revolves around the allegation of debt and failure to supply bricks.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Renjith Kumar B, was acquitted of all charges. The complainant could not prove his claims regarding the debt.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was liable to pay.
The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was liable to pay.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was liable to pay.
The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was liable to pay.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that DW1 is liable to pay Rs.4,50,000/- to PW1.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s 255 (1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajesh K. G.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renjith Kumar B
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.344557, Dishonour memo, Lawyers Notice
Defendants Documents
Several receipts regarding payments made by the accused
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Haris K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The Complainant sought recovery of Rs.4,50,000/- from the Accused.
Evidence:
Hence the points are answered against complainant and accused is entitled for acquittal.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Accused issued this cheque towards the debt incurred but it was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type:
Dishonour memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicated the dishonour of the cheque presented by the Complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Complainant issued this notice demanding payment after the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the Accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation that the Accused received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The response from the Accused to the legal notice sent by the Complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Document produced by the Accused to support his claims regarding money transactions.
Reference:
Ext.D1
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Set of receipts produced by the Accused to show payments made to the Complainant's account.
Reference:
Ext.D2 series
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Another set of receipts produced by the Accused related to payments to the Complainant.
Reference:
Ext.D3 series
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2016
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act