Case Summary
The complainant, Rajendran T. G., filed a withdrawal petition against the accused, Aneesh Kumar. The court allowed the withdrawal and acquitted the accused under Section 257 CrPC.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Aneesh Kumar, was acquitted as the complainant withdrew the case. His bail bonds were cancelled, and he was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition.
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition.
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC. His bail bonds are cancelled and set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran T. G.
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Binoy Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Haris K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Withdrawal petition filed by the complainant was allowed.
Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused was acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020