Case Summary
The plaintiffs Rajeev and Sarala have filed a suit against the defendants Sudhakumari, Sujith, and Sooraj. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeev
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarala
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudhakumari
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sooraj
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhash Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Feba Elma Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana Lakshmi.T.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajeev et al vs Sudhakumari et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeev et al vs Sudhakumari et al regarding dismissal for default.