Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 58/2023

Case between Rajeeb P.I. vs Noushad Muhammed et al regarding non payment of balance court fee.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY.
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
Case Code No.
58
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajeeb P.I. is the plaintiff in this suit against Noushad Muhammed and Shamla Beevi. The court rejected the suit due to non payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to non payment of balance court fee. The court announced no costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to non payment of balance court fee. The court announced no costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeeb P.I.
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushad Muhammed
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamla Beevi
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Thomas Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Darly M. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.A Hassan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sayyed Ali Khan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sayyed Alikhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Elsamma Kuriakose vs The Chief Manager (Authorised Officer) regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson Joseph vs Raveendran @ Kunjumon et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unnikrishnan K vs Mohanan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hellen Joseph vs Joji Thomas regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sheela Raju et al vs P.K. Madhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won