Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA 5/2025 in OS 55/2024

Case between RAJAN vs KERALA GRAMIN BANK regarding setting aside exparte decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajan, the petitioner, seeks to set aside an exparte decree due to being bedridden from illness. The court opines there is insufficient reason to condone the delay in presenting the application.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to set aside the exparte decree due to lack of sufficient cause to condone the delay.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to set aside the exparte decree due to lack of sufficient cause to condone the delay.
Key Reasoning:
The reason to condone the delay is not supported by any material particulars.
Why Defendant Won:
The reason to condone the delay is not supported by any material particulars.
Supporting Evidence
It was held by the Hon’ble High Court that discretion to condone the delay has to be exercised judiciously and that the expression sufficient cause cannot be liberally interpreted if negligence, inaction or lack of bonafides is attributed to the party.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore RPIA 5/25 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
RAJAN
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. A. Jaleel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Praveen Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya. V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte decree dated 30/09/2024.
Evidence:
Hence, As per the discussion there are no reason to set aside the exparte decree dated 30/9/24 and there is no sufficient cause to condone the delay.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between RAJAN vs KERALA GRAMIN BANK regarding setting aside exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between RAJAN vs KERALA GRAMIN BANK regarding setting aside exparte decree

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ASHRAF. M regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SIJU THOMAS regarding settlement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won