Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O S 225/2019

Case between Radhamma vs Soman Nair regarding compromise.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Radhamma and Preetha filed the suit against Soman Nair and Gopalakrishnan Nair. The case involved a compromise which was subsequently approved by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court approved a compromise between the parties and decreed the suit in terms of this compromise. The survey plan produced shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court approved a compromise between the parties and decreed the suit in terms of this compromise. The survey plan produced shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhamma
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preetha
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soman Nair
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan Nair
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition, Survey plan marked as Ext.C1
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Marked as part of the compromise filed
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Radhamma vs Soman Nair regarding compromise.
Case Code Year
Case between Radhamma vs Soman Nair regarding compromise.

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won