Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 762/2021

Case between Rachel George vs Ramesh K. G regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-02
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rachel George, the plaintiff, has brought a suit against Ramesh K. G, the defendant, for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant issued a cheque that was subsequently dishonoured.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay back the borrowed amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rachel George (89 years) Flat No. 8 A, Noel Touch Stone, Crash Road, Vazhakala, Kochi, Kerala – 682 021

Defendants

Ramesh K. G (Age not specified years) 5/5 F, Saravanam, Trinity High Grove, Karimakkad Road, Thrikkakara P. O, Thrikkakara North (Part), Ernakulam – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 2,50,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statement of transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer print out of statement of transaction for the period from 01.04.2020 to 31.05.2020, subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pay-in Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marks a financial transaction related to the amount borrowed.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued for the borrowed amount which was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the notice sent by the lawyer concerning the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for postal communication related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment receipt of petition issued by Thrikkakara Police Station, subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 03/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases