Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Rent Control Petition No. 3 of 2015

Case between Rabiya vs P. Karunakaran regarding eviction application for starting a furniture business

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
1 year and 13 days
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A petition filed by Rabiya seeking eviction of P. Karunakaran to use the property for starting a furniture business, based on bonafide need.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to vacate the property within three months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction under Section 11(3)
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to vacate the property within three months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Since the respondents opted to remain exparte, the evidence adduced by the petitioners remains unchallenged...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pannikandathil Moosa Haji's daughter Rabiya
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o. Manakkadavan Kammad Kutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Karunakaran
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o. Kunhikannan
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext. C1: Commissioner report, Ext. C2: Plan
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building within three months.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965...
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners entitled to realize the cost of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report on the business activities in the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext. C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plan related to the location and usage of the property.
Reference:
Ext. C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Bonafide need for own business
Case Code
Case between Rabiya vs P. Karunakaran regarding eviction application for starting a furniture business
Case Code Year
Case between Rabiya vs P. Karunakaran regarding eviction application for starting a furniture business

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 12/08/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 12/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Sat, 12/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Puliyakkathodi Koitha et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Musthafa et al regarding petition delivery and closure
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Execution Petition Not mentioned
Case between Kuathakath Kader Javid vs Kuttyamakkanakath Shajida regarding decree execution
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Proceedings Plaintiff Won
Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs Abdul Nazar regarding eviction
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won