Case Summary
Petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from a shop room due to unpaid rent, subletting, and bonafide need for security staff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved unpaid rent, unauthorized subletting, and bonafide need for security staff.
The petitioner proved unpaid rent, unauthorized subletting, and bonafide need for security staff.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed directing the respondents to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under Section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
M.T. Muhammed (50 years)
Iringavoor Amsom, Vaniyannoor Desom, Tirur Taluk
Salmanul Faris (27 years)
Iringavoor Amsom, Vaniyannoor Desom, Tirur Taluk
Muhammed Faizal (24 years)
Iringavoor Amsom, Vaniyannoor Desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Abdul Nazar (49 years)
Palakkavalappil House, Tirur Amsom and Desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioners to get vacant possession of the shop rooms within three months
Evidence:
The petition is allowed directing the respondents to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under Section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of rental agreement with the respondent
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding vacant possession from the respondent
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the lawyer notice served to the respondent
Reference:
A3