Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 792/2021

Case between Quilonites For a Constructive Kollam et al vs Alleged Quilonites For a Constructive Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Code No.
792
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the Quilonites For a Constructive Kollam as plaintiffs against an alleged faction of the same organization as defendants. The plaintiffs filed for a declaration and injunction but remained absent during the trial.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of filed affidavit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of filed affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff remained absent and no affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Quilonites For a Constructive Kollam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suvarnakumar. S
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Praboth S Kandachira
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alleged Quilonites For a Constructive Kollam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balachandran
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh Kumar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. M. Abdul Khadar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhu Balakrishnan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P.Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ambili Jabbar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thampi.V.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District, Kerala
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 04/13/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sarojini Amma vs Madhusoodanan Pillai et al regarding Declaration, Partition and Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujatha et al vs Lalu.C regarding restoration of RP. 127/2025
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won