Case Summary
The case involves Punjab National Bank as the plaintiff and Vishnu P.A and Ajith P.A as defendants. The plaintiff did not press the memo for the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The judgment was pronounced in the open court. The plaintiff did not press the memo for the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
O.S No.642/2023 JUDGMENT Plaintiff represented. Not press memo filed. Not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Punjab National Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishnu P.A
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith P.A
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreejith S. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Romil Regi George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh B. Kurup
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Asif Ali M.H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aravind T. Ramesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.M Fathima
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Vishnu P.A et al regarding suit not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Vishnu P.A et al regarding suit not pressed