Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 650/2024

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Trend Beauty Spa et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Punjab National Bank, is involved in a suit against defendants Trend Beauty Spa and two individuals regarding the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, requiring the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest. The defendants' failure to appear in court led to the judgment being passed ex parte.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of 7,80,810/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, requiring the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest. The defendants' failure to appear in court led to the judgment being passed ex parte.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and established the defendants' liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and established the defendants' liability.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,80,810/-.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Punjab National Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Trend Beauty Spa
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Asif K
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhair A
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of General Power of Attorney, Loan Application Form, Sanction Letter, Affidavit of Co-borrower, Agreement of Term Loan, Partnership letter, undertaking and declaration, Application for Restructuring under Resolution Frame Work, Arrangement Letter, Pronote, True Copy of Notice, Postal Receipt and Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya P. Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of 7,80,810/- with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the defendants owe a total amount of 7,80,810/- to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: General Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the exhibits to support the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the loan application made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the approval of the loan to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Affidavit of Co-borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial obligations of the co-borrower.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement of Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms of the loan facility provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Partnership letter, undertaking and declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document clarifies the partnership and commitments given by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Application for Restructuring under Resolution Frame Work
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This application reflects the defendants' request for restructuring the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter details the arrangements made regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a promissory note for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: True copy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice informs the defendants about their debt obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Receipt and Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents provide proof of communication sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Trend Beauty Spa et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Trend Beauty Spa et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won