Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 818/2023

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Mohammed Samith Muftha et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Punjab National Bank, is suing the defendants, Mohammed Samith Muftha and Fathima Subair, for recovery of an educational loan amount due. The defendants did not repay the loan, leading to the plaintiff filing a suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of Rs.1,58,890/- along with interest. The defendants did not appear in court to contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants ordered to pay Rs.1,58,890/- with 9% interest per annum from date of suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of Rs.1,58,890/- along with interest. The defendants did not appear in court to contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents from the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents from the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.1,58,890/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 22.8.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Punjab National Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Samith Muftha
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima Subair
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of terms and conditions of Education issued by plaintiff accepted by the defendants, Original agreement of Education loan dated 15.12.14, Certified copy of statement of account with certificate.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.P.Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.1,58,890/-.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.1,58,890/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Terms and Conditions of Education
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of terms and conditions of Education issued by plaintiff accepted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Education Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement of Education loan Annexure I.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Education Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement of Education loan Annexure II.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original balance and security confirmation letter.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original balance and security confirmation letter.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of re-call notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal cover.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of statement of account with certificate.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Mohammed Samith Muftha et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Mohammed Samith Muftha et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won