Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Premalatha, are seeking redress in their suit against the defendants, including Latha.P.S. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were not prepared to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Premalatha
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gadha
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alku
- Party Age
- 5
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latha.P.S.
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayachandran Nair
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayakrishnan
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayaraj
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Gaganan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Premalatha et al vs Latha.P.S. et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Premalatha et al vs Latha.P.S. et al regarding dismissal for default.