Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 1145 /2023

Case between Pratheesh J R vs Sanilkumar K S regarding temporary injunction

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-05
Duration
Case Code No.
1145
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pratheesh J R is the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction against Sanilkumar K S, who is the counter claim defendant. The petitioner claims he is the owner of a generator rented to the respondent, who defaulted on payments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for a temporary injunction against the respondent, restraining him from alienating the property until the suit's disposal.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the respondent from alienating the counter claim schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for a temporary injunction against the respondent, restraining him from alienating the property until the suit's disposal.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and demonstrated that irreparable injury would be caused if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the apprehension of the petitioner is well founded. Since the schedule property is a movable property if the property is sold to another person, its title also goes along with possession. Hence balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: 1) The respondent is restrained by way of temporary injunction from alienating the counter claim schedule property till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheesh J R
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanilkumar K S
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original receipt of purchase of counter claim scheduled property, Printout of the screen shots of google pay transfer of monthly rent, Copy of Complaint filed before the C I, Infopark Police Station, Acknowledgement receipt of petition issued from InfoPark Police Station
Defendants Documents
Photographs

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dougles Linsby N R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nandu V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vijith Kumar J V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Robert Dias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Judy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Litto Palathingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreevarthik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained by way of temporary injunction from alienating the counter claim schedule property till the disposal of the suit.
Evidence:
Hence the point 1 to 4 are found in favour of the petitioner. The petition is allowed as follows: The respondent is restrained by way of temporary injunction from alienating the counter claim schedule property till the disposal of the suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
No order as to costs.
Evidence:
No order as to costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt of purchase of counter claim scheduled property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Google Pay Transfer Screenshot
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Printout of the screen shots of google pay transfer of monthly rent to the account of Mr. Ajeesh P K K
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Complaint filed before the C I, Infopark Police Station by the petitioner
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgement receipt of petition issued from InfoPark Police Station
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photographs submitted by the respondent
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won