Case Summary
The case involves a dispute among Poonattil Krishnan's children regarding the partition of ancestral property. Plaintiffs Rajan, Sreenivasan, and Chandrasekharan claim their right to shares in the property against their siblings and a supplemental defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence showing entitlement to shares in the ancestral property.
The plaintiff proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence showing entitlement to shares in the ancestral property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The item No. 1 and 2 in the plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares and C and D schedule properties shall be divided into 10 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Rajan (55 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Sreenivasan (45 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Chandrasekharan (42 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Chinnammu (59 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Karthiayani (57 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Kandar @ Krishnan (65 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Vasudevan (48 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Sarojini (67 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Udaya (26 years)
Niramaruthur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Ammadkkanakath Yoonus (45 years)
Ammadkkanakath House, Niramaruthoor amsom, desom, Tiur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled to shares in the property as specified.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: The item No. 1 and 2 in the plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares and C and D schedule properties shall be divided into 10 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the partition of property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the assignment of property rights.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that outlines the partition of property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant demanding partition.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment related to the notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Report prepared by the Advocate Commissioner inspecting the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Sketch related to the commission report for the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2