Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.5 OF 2016

Case between P.K.V Saidalavi vs Fathima regarding property ownership

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-07-11
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Tue, 07/11/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff seeks perpetual injunction to prevent defendant from trespassing into the property based on disputed property ownership.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit seeking perpetual injunction was dismissed with costs due to previous litigation establishing defendant's property rights.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction - Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit seeking perpetual injunction was dismissed with costs due to previous litigation establishing defendant's property rights.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff concealed facts, failed to prove possession, and failed similar previous litigation.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff concealed facts, failed to prove possession, and failed similar previous litigation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff failed to prove his possession and brought the suit after earlier litigation failures.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.K.V Saidalavi @ Bavakkutty
Party Age
52
Relation
Son of Moideenkuttyhaji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
50
Relation
Daughter of Saidalavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Assignment Deed No.767/1934, Jenm Assignment Deed No.147/2007, Settlement Deed No.3856/2014, Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Copy of Common Order, Copy of Judgment, Certified Copy of Decree, Report in EP, Copies of Orders, Commissioner's Report, Sketch

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Perpetual injunction sought by plaintiff
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Property ownership documents
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified copy of decree
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishing property rights
Reference:
B3
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commissioner's Report
Reference:
C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Disputed property ownership
Case Code
Case between P.K.V Saidalavi vs Fathima regarding property ownership
Case Code Year
Case between P.K.V Saidalavi vs Fathima regarding property ownership

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 07/06/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/11/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 07/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Nalakath Muhammed Salih et al vs Kayattum Parambil Ibrahim et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Thiyyadath Rajendran vs Parambatt Moideen Haji regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Raphy Kooliyath vs Krishnakumar.K regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won