Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 276 OF 2014

Case between Pilathottathil Muhammed Kutty et al vs Abdul Jaleel regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-12-16
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Sat, 12/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs seek repayment of Rs. 4,38,000/- borrowed by the defendant for business expansion, evidenced by a dishonored cheque. Defendant claims investment as partnership capital and disputes liability. Court decrees in favour of the plaintiff for the cheque amount with interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decrees the defendant to pay Rs. 4,38,000/- to the plaintiff with 6% interest from the date of filing till realization.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Repayment of borrowed amount with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money
Final Judgment
No
The court decrees the defendant to pay Rs. 4,38,000/- to the plaintiff with 6% interest from the date of filing till realization.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's evidence including dishonored cheque and witness testimony proves the defendant's debt and issuance of the cheque.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's evidence including dishonored cheque and witness testimony proves the defendant's debt and issuance of the cheque.
Supporting Evidence
More over its execution is denied by the plaintiff. According to the learned counsel for the plaintiff that document is a fabricated one. That is why it bears only the signature of the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

DW1 also admitted that the whole facts of the case is known to the PW1. Hence there is no evidence to unruffle the evidence put forward by the plaintiff. Hence the suit is decreed as follows : - 1. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.4,38,000/- (Rupees four lakh and thirty eight thousand only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit to till the date of realization. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pilathottathil Muhammed Kutty
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Alavi Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunnakkad Fathima
Party Age
41
Relation
Wife of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Jaleel
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Hydru Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Cheque, Rejected instalment Advice, Receipt, Lawyer Notice, Reply notice, Certified copy of judgment
Defendants Documents
Photocopy of Karar

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery of Money
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Repayment of borrowed amount with interest
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.4,38,000/- (Rupees four lakh and thirty eight thousand only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit to till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented borrowing and dishonored payment
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Receipts and Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of attempts to recover the borrowed amount
Reference:
A2 to A6
Document Type: Photocopy of Karar
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's attempt to submit evidence of partnership agreement, but not admitted
Reference:
B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Loan repayment dispute
Case Code
Case between Pilathottathil Muhammed Kutty et al vs Abdul Jaleel regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Pilathottathil Muhammed Kutty et al vs Abdul Jaleel regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 12/20/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/16/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Tharayamkandathil Shaji regarding cheque dishonour
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs A.P. Hamza regarding loan repayment
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayisha et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pushpalatha et al regarding loan repayment
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money Plaintiff Won
Case between SML Finance Limited vs Sidheeq et al regarding loan realization
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money Plaintiff Won