Case Summary
Phavas Nazar is the complainant, and Kaladharan K.S. is the accused in this case regarding the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent during the hearing, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the absence of the complainant, who was not ready to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The accused was acquitted due to the complainant's absence and lack of evidence.
The accused was acquitted due to the complainant's absence and lack of evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The accused was acquitted due to the complainant's absence and lack of evidence.
The accused was acquitted due to the complainant's absence and lack of evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the complainant was not present and was not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC. His bail bond is cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Phavas Nazar
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kaladharan K.S.
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Haris
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- John Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act