Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 332 OF 2011

Case between Periyangot Lakshmikutty and Karthika vs Ramesh Kumar and Reena regarding temporary injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-12-06
Duration
7 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking temporary injunction against the defendants, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs for temporary injunction was dismissed due to their absence during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Temporary Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Periyangot Lakshmikutty (48 years) PO.Trikkandiyur, Tirur Taluk Karthika (Age not specified years) PO.Trikkandiyur, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Ramesh Kumar (38 years) Vazhiyil Padam, Thrikandiyur amsom, desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Reena (43 years) Vazhiyil Padam, Thrikandiyur amsom, desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking temporary injunction
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Vakalath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
No instruction endorsed on Vakalath.
Reference:
No instruction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2011 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases