Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 377 OF 2014

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding realisation of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SRI. BIJU V.G.
Order Date
2015-03-18
Duration
11 months and 4 days
Case Closed
Wed, 03/18/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed a suit against defendants to recover chitty amounts with interest, as defendants defaulted on payment despite repeated demands and lawyer notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest from the defendants and their assets, along with costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of the total amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest from the defendants and their assets, along with costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants opted to remain ex-parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. The plaintiffs have proved their case by the oral evidence of PW1 and the documents produced in this case. So, the plaintiffs are entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows - Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from realization from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha
Relation
Represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o. Koyatty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaika
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o. Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nahas
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o. Kadeeja
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazer
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o. Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sareena
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o. Nazer
Plaintiffs Documents
Receipts, Agreement, Lawyer notices with postal receipts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest and costs
Evidence:
Plaintiffs proved their case with oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by the defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by defendants for chitty amount in chitty No.206 on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt executed by defendants for receiving the amount in chitty No.208 on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kuri agreement executed by the defendants on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 03/18/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/18/2015 - 12:00
From
Sun, 03/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Tue, 03/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individuals

Similar Cases

Case between Saheer Ahammed vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding money realization
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Rafi @ Manu vs Sajitha regarding money realization
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed K. et al regarding money realisation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiju regarding loan default
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Irshad T.P. et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won