Case Summary
Plaintiffs filed a suit against defendants to recover chitty amounts with interest, as defendants defaulted on payment despite repeated demands and lawyer notices.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of the total amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest from the defendants and their assets, along with costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
The plaintiffs proved their case by oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants opted to remain ex-parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. The plaintiffs have proved their case by the oral evidence of PW1 and the documents produced in this case. So, the plaintiffs are entitled for a decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows - Plaintiffs are allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from realization from the defendants and their assets.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha
- Relation
- Represented by its Secretary
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o. Koyatty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaika
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- W/o. Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nahas
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o. Kadeeja
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazer
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o. Bappu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sareena
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o. Nazer
Plaintiffs Documents
Receipts, Agreement, Lawyer notices with postal receipts
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs.1,49,660/- with interest and costs
Evidence:
Plaintiffs proved their case with oral evidence and documents, demonstrating defaults by the defendants and non-payment despite repeated demands.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by defendants for chitty amount in chitty No.206 on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt executed by defendants for receiving the amount in chitty No.208 on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kuri agreement executed by the defendants on 23.2.2012.
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A4
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A5
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A6
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A7
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants with postal receipt.
Reference:
A8
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri yogakshema Sabha et al vs Cheracham Veettil Puthanpurayil Habeeb Rehman et al regarding realisation of money