ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 82 OF 2016

Case between Perayil Shahul Hameed vs Muhammadali et al regarding right of way

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2017-07-31

Duration

1 year

Case Closed

Mon, 07/31/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Perayil Shahul Hameed, as the plaintiff, filed a suit against Muhammadali and Haris seeking injunction to prevent obstruction of a way. The suit was dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff regarding a pathway claimed to have been purchased by the defendants through a document.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff regarding a pathway claimed to have been purchased by the defendants through a document.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is filed for injunction with respect to a way. The defendant has purchased the way by virtue of document No. 1691/2017. The plaintiff filed a statement to that effect. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Perayil Shahul Hameed
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o. Alikkutty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammadali
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o. Moideenkutty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Haris
Party Age: 25
Relation: S/o. Muhammadali

Plaintiffs Documents

Statement filed by the plaintiff

Defendants Documents

Document No. 1691/2017

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Vipin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Injunction to prevent obstruction of a pathway

Evidence: