ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 183 OF 2014

Case between Suhara et al vs Kunhayisha et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF

Order Date

2017-03-02

Duration

2 years 4 months 19 days

Case Closed

Thu, 03/02/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought declaration and injunction but suit was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for declaration and injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for declaration and injunction. It is submitted by the plaintiffs that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiffs called, absent. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Suhara
Party Age: 62
Relation: Daughter of Beeras

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Asya
Party Age: 50
Relation: Child of Thandalam valappil Hamsa @ Kunhippa

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunhayisha
Party Age: 65
Relation: Daughter of Chemmala Abdul Khader

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.T. Shefeeq
Party Age: 42

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.T. Abdul Azeez
Party Age: 44

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mansoor
Party Age: 34
Relation: Son of Muhammed Ali

Plaintiffs Documents

Not available

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Seeking declaration and injunction

Evidence: