Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 79/2018

Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs C.K. Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Paulson Paulose and Petson Paulose against defendants C.K. Thomas, George Thomas, Anwar, and Praveen Pappahcan. The plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence, leading to the dismissal of their suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as plaintiffs failed to present evidence during the trial.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as plaintiffs failed to present evidence during the trial.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs not ready to adduce evidence. Proof affidavit not filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit stands dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paulson Paulose
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o Late C.K. Paulose
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Petson Paulose
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o Late C.K. Paulose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.K. Thomas
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o Late Kochuvareeth
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Thomas
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o Thomas Varghese
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anwar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o C.K. Moidu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveen Pappahcan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o. Pappachan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.M. Binitha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Geethu C.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hashim Althaf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit stands dismissed for default due to plaintiffs not being ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs C.K. Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs C.K. Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won