Case Summary
Pathumma filed a suit against Muhammed Shafi and Abdul Khadar seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathumma
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o. Kunhimarakkar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shafi
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o. Alungal Kunhahammed Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Khadar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o. Alunal Kunhahammed Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P. Najmudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.P. Jamshid Rehman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.A. Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pathumma vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pathumma vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding injunction