Case Summary
Plaintiffs Mohamed Kasim and Seenath filed a suit for injunction against defendants Sharafudheen and Noushad. The suit was dismissed as plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiffs are absent, the suit is dismissed without cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohamed Kasim
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o Beerankutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Seenath
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- D/o Beerankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharafudheen
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o Yahu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noushad
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o Kunhimohamed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Injunction relief sought by plaintiffs
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohamed Kasim et al vs Sharafudheen et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mohamed Kasim et al vs Sharafudheen et al regarding Injunction