Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 265 / 2024

Case between Parthan C P vs Shaji regarding Review Petition

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a review petition filed by the plaintiff, Parthan C P, seeking to review and set aside an order that rejected his plaint. The defendant, Shaji, opposes the petition, claiming it is not maintainable and that the rejection was lawful due to failure to remit court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition was dismissed as the court found no basis for reviewing the prior order which rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees. The court determined that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient grounds for the review.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The review petition was dismissed as the court found no basis for reviewing the prior order which rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees. The court determined that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient grounds for the review.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner did not remit the balance court fee as required, and thus, there were no grounds for the review.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner did not remit the balance court fee as required, and thus, there were no grounds for the review.
Supporting Evidence
I have not seen any error apparent on the face of the record or any other reason for reviewing the order.

Judgment Evidence:

In light of the above discussion, the above petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parthan C P
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N K Mohanlal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Review Petition seeking to set aside the order rejecting the plaint
Evidence:
In light of the above discussion, the above petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parthan C P vs Shaji regarding Review Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Parthan C P vs Shaji regarding Review Petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between John Douglas Bivera et al vs Percy Prakasia et al regarding review petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Sandhya S Pai vs M Vijaya Sankar regarding review petition.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding review of a court order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Rajagopalan regarding review petition in Original Suit No.1391/2005
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won