Case Summary
Rent control petition filed by three petitioners against the respondent where the petition was ultimately dismissed due to absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition Dismissed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Evidence not found indicating the reason for the defendant's win.
Judgment Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called absent. No representation. Petition is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parappurath Safiya
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Wife of
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parappurath Abdul Rahoof
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parappurath Rubeela
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thekkepeediyekkal Ali
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Documents not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Documents not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Petition dismissed
Description:
The petition filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed by the court.
Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called absent. No representation. Petition is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parappurath Safiya et al vs Thekkepeediyekkal Ali regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Parappurath Safiya et al vs Thekkepeediyekkal Ali regarding Rent Control