Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Petition (Pauper) No. 21 OF 2017

Case between Parameswaran vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd., et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-10-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Parameswaran, seeks permission to sue as an indigent person against the Accomplish Marketing Company and its directors due to his inability to pay court fees. He claims to be entitled to 7,70,000 from the defendants but lacks the financial capacity to pay the necessary court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for the plaintiff to sue as an indigent person. It determined that the plaintiff did not have sufficient means to pay the court fee required for the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Petition (Pauper)
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for the plaintiff to sue as an indigent person. It determined that the plaintiff did not have sufficient means to pay the court fee required for the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff lacked sufficient means to pay the court fee as prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff lacked sufficient means to pay the court fee as prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Nothing has been brought out in order to show that the petitioner is having sufficient means to the pay court fee. I find no reason to disbelieve the case of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint as O.S. No.320/2019.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parameswaran
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachandran
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gafoor
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Proof affidavit in lieu of his examination in chief
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled for the relief claimed in the petition to sue as in forma pauperis.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable him to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for the relief claimed in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Petition (Pauper)
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Parameswaran vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd., et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons
Case Code Year
Case between Parameswaran vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd., et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Subair regarding money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vineesh Kumar et al vs Subrahmanian et al regarding failure to file affidavit
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Unknown Unknown
Case between K.Muhammed Basheer vs K.Sheeba et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Decree Plaintiff Won