Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by Pappachan against George and others. The plaintiff has not pressed the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pappachan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shijo
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishnu
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joshy
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hazeem Khan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.C. Polachan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Santhoshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit not pressed. Memo filed to that effect. Hence dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pappachan vs George et al regarding suit not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Pappachan vs George et al regarding suit not pressed.