Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No: 12/2014

Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri.Biju. V. G, B.Sc, LL.B.
Order Date
2014-07-31
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complainant alleged the accused of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Complainant later withdrew the complaint resulting in the accused being acquitted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused is acquitted under Section 257 Cr P.C. as the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under Section 257 Cr P.C. as the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. Subramanyan
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Zakaria Sadique
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M. K. Dinesh. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M. V. Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Complainant's plea of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 07/31/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/02/2014 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ashraf vs Shahida regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act Prosecution
Case between Mujeeb Rahman. K. K. vs Abdul Rasheed. V. regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty Haji regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Cheque Dishonour Case Defendant Won
Case between Indira vs Sreeja S regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won