Case Summary
N.M. Balakrishnan filed a suit against Falcon Trading. Both parties were absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default due to lack of interest and representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as neither party was present and the plaintiff did not show interest in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.M. Balakrishnan
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Falcon Trading
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Premraj.C.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sushanth.J.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishnapriya.B.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sudhikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Swapna Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff and defendant.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in adducing evidence. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2021