Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.419/2022

Case between Nikhil N. Asher vs Asha Suresh et al regarding Suit For Realization Of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-09-02
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Nikhil N. Asher, is seeking to recover outstanding payments from the defendants who are partners of Spectra Associates, now Spectra Décor, amounting to Rs.86,238/- due to non-payment for goods purchased on credit. The defendants failed to appear in court despite summons, leading to an ex-parte hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing him to recover a total sum of Rs.1,17,283/- along with applicable interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.1,17,283/- from the defendants and from their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing him to recover a total sum of Rs.1,17,283/- along with applicable interest and costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence presented by the plaintiff established his claim, as the defendants did not contest the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence presented by the plaintiff established his claim, as the defendants did not contest the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A2 to A8 established his case as pleaded by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.1,17,283/- (Rupees One lakh seventeen thousand two hundred and eighty three only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nikhil N. Asher
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha Suresh
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumya Jithin
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lawyer notice dated 01.12.2021, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.G. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,17,283 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.1,17,283/­ from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum on the amount due from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.1,17,283/­ from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.1,17,283/­ from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the lawyer's notice dated 01.12.2021 sent to the defendants regarding the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the original postal receipt dated 01.12.2021 which confirms the sending of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the original of the lawyer's notice returned unserved, highlighting the defendants' refusal to accept the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the ledger account together with certification under Section 65(b), providing evidence of the financial transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A5 & A5(a)
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another copy of the lawyer's notice dated 01.12.2021, reinforcing the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These postal receipts serve as proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the returned cover which further indicates the defendants' avoidance of communication.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 established the plaintiff's case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Nikhil N. Asher vs Asha Suresh et al regarding Suit For Realization Of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Nikhil N. Asher vs Asha Suresh et al regarding Suit For Realization Of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Laly Rajan et al vs GIC Housing Finance Ltd. et al regarding mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pradeep K vs Nila Homes (P) Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.D. Premnath vs M/s. Jaihind Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Parka International, M/s Tag Retial Services vs Hannah Miriam Abraham regarding Suit for money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Radhakrishnan M U et al vs Santhosh Kumar P P regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won