Case Summary
The case involves a dispute over property where the plaintiff seeks a prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The 2nd defendant has requested to reopen evidence in order to present additional information regarding the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Evidence of 2nd defendant reopened on payment of Rs.500/- to respondent within 7 days.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that reopening evidence is essential for a fair and effective adjudication of the case.
The court determined that reopening evidence is essential for a fair and effective adjudication of the case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1) Petition is allowed. 2) Evidence of 2nd defendant reopened on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to respondent within 7 days.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Nicemol Nishad alias Nice Nisha (34 years years)
Alappatt House, Vaikom Muhammed Basheer Road, Koonamtthai, Edappilly.P.O., Ernakulam District – 682 024
Defendants
Mohanan (65 years years)
Madhukappally House, Ambalam Road, Koonamthai, Edappally – 24
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allowed reopening of the evidence for the 2nd defendant.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I find merit in the above petition.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ordered payment of costs to the respondent.
Evidence:
However, to meet the ends of justice costs has to ordered to respondent.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Exhibit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence submitted by the plaintiff in support of their case.
Reference:
Exts.A1 to A6
Document Type:
Advocate Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Marked as evidence submitted by the Advocate Commissioner based on inspection.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Additional Document
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Marked as additional evidence relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)