Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1062/2013

Case between N.C. Robert vs Vasu et al regarding a civil suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-16
Duration
Case Code No.
1062
Case Closed
Tue, 01/16/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.C. Robert, a 77-year-old pensioner, is the plaintiff in this civil suit. The defendants include Vasu, Sulochana, and others from the same locality. The plaintiff was absent in court and the suit was dismissed for default due to lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case despite receiving notice. The plaintiff has shown no interest in proceeding.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case despite receiving notice. The plaintiff has shown no interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff has no representation repeatedly.

Judgment Evidence:

Accordingly suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.C. Robert
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasu
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulochana
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mani
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Midhun
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vipin
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G. Mary
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S. Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Sudha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S. Gopi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu Shankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/16/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won