Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.820/2018

Case between Nazeera vs Sophi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S., Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Code No.
820
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff Nazeera against the defendant Sophi and additional defendants regarding the fixation of boundary and injunction. The court delivered a judgment on the matter after final hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to no balance court fee being remitted. The plaintiff was present during the judgment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to no balance court fee being remitted. The plaintiff was present during the judgment.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 R.11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nazeera
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sophi
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shafeera
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahira
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reghunathan Pillai
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sivaprasad
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Sajeev Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sumith Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Govinda Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee remitted so far. Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 R.11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won