Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.92/2019

Case between Navas vs Hamsa regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Navas, the plaintiff, was absent and did not have representation. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default. There was no representation for the plaintiff during the court proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Navas (45 years years) Pulickal House, Thettali Kara, Chowara Village, Aluva Taluk.

Defendants

Hamsa (59 years years) Kottayil House, Okkal P.O, Vallam Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases