Case Summary
Navas, the plaintiff, was absent and did not have representation. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default. There was no representation for the plaintiff during the court proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Navas
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamsa
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. A. Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N. C. Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. R. Santhoshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anilkumar S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019