Case Summary
Naseema filed a suit for injunction against Jameela and Aboobacker. The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Naseema
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammedkutty
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.A.Samad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.A.Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Plaintiff name called absent. D1, D3 present. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Naseema vs Jameela et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Naseema vs Jameela et al regarding injunction