ORIGINAL SUIT No.146 OF 2017

Case between Nalini vs Radha et al regarding partition of property

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2018-03-03

Duration

1 year 11 months 6 days

Case Closed

Sat, 03/03/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nalini filed a suit against Radha et al seeking partition of property. The plaintiff claimed her share in the jointly owned property which was denied by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court decreed the partition of the property, dividing it into 4 equal shares. Plaintiff Nalini was allotted one share, and each defendant was also given one share.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Partition of property and separate allotment of shares

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The court decreed the partition of the property, dividing it into 4 equal shares. Plaintiff Nalini was allotted one share, and each defendant was also given one share.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved her entitlement to a share in the jointly owned property, and the defendants did not contest the claim.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved her entitlement to a share in the jointly owned property, and the defendants did not contest the claim.

Supporting Evidence

The defendant appeared and filed written statement admitting the plaint claim

Judgment Evidence:

The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds. The plaintiff is entitled to get one share out of 4 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property. Each defendant is entitled to get one share out of 4 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Nalini
Party Age: 62
Relation: Wife of Thupran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Radha
Party Age: 38
Relation: Wife of Balakrishnan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Leela
Party Age: 35
Relation: Wife of Chandran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sadasivan
Party Age: 32
Relation: Son of Thupran

Plaintiffs Documents

Genealogical table of plaintiff and defendants, Document No.756 of 1971 from Sub Registrar's Office

Defendants Documents

Unknown

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P.Sreehari
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.Vivek.P.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Division of the property into 4 equal shares and allotment to parties

Evidence:

The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds. The plaintiff is entitled to get one share out of 4 shares.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification