Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 254 OF 2015

Case between Deceased Tharammal Puthenpeediyekkal Kunhimuhammed's Children et al vs Jamsheer and Ami regarding partition of property

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B
Order Date
2017-03-01
Duration
2 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, children of Tharammal Puthenpeediyekkal Kunhimuhammed, sought partition of property, claiming ownership through ancestral and assigned shares. Defendants contested on grounds of prior ownership and equitable considerations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition awarding specific shares to each party and referred allocation of a disputed portion to subsequent proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
In the absence of evidence showing defendants' continued share ownership, plaintiffs' claim for partition based on ancestral and transferred shares was upheld.

Judgment Evidence:

The 1st plaintiff is entitled to get 40 shares out of 144 shares in the plaint B schedule property. The 2nd plaintiff is entitled to get 23 shares out of 144 shares in the plaint B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Ameer (28 years) Marakkara amsom, desom, Randathani Post. Tirur Taluk Mumthas (27 years) Marakkara amsom, desom, Randathani Post. Tirur Taluk Abdurahim (23 years) Marakkara amsom, desom, Randathani Post. Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Jamsheer (28 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom, Randathani Post, Tirur Taluk Ami (58 years) Fathima Suhara (33 years) Marakkara amosm, deosm, Randathani Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition issued with specific shares allotted to each party
Evidence:
The 1st plaintiff is entitled to get 40 shares out of 144 shares in the plaint B schedule property. The 2nd plaintiff is entitled to get 23 shares out of 144 shares in the plaint B schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established ancestral property ownership
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued for partition demand
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of property assignment
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details of the boundary and property ownership
Reference:
C1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 03/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases