Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.473/2019

Case between M.V.Geetha et al vs M.V.Sathyanathan et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs M.V.Geetha, M.V.Sudha, M.V.Baby, and M.V.Neena are seeking partition against the defendants M.V.Sathyanathan, M.V.Jalaja, M.V.Silja, Dhanya, Sanvi Sheri, Abdul Muneer.P, Sarjas.K.V, and Shisana.T. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs' representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation. The court had no option as no evidence was presented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation. The court had no option as no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V.Geetha
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V.Sudha
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V.Baby
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V.Neena
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V.Sathyanathan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V.Jalaja
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V.Silja
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhanya
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanvi Sheri
Party Age
8
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. KP Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.GC Sreelekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.T.Madhavanunni
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N.B.Pramod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
However, no petition is seen filed seeking adjournment of case. No evidence adduced. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between M.V.Geetha et al vs M.V.Sathyanathan et al regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between M.V.Geetha et al vs M.V.Sathyanathan et al regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode Thaluk& District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abdul Gafoor et al vs Pathumma et al regarding partition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammedali vs Pathummabi KK et al regarding partition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won