Original Suit No. 484 / 2020

Case between Muhammedali vs Pathummabi KK et al regarding partition.

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE

Judge

Smt.Meera John K.

Order Date

2025-08-18

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for partition presented by the plaintiff, Muhammedali. The court dismissed the suit for default as no evidence was adduced despite previous postings.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence despite multiple opportunities.

Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not present any evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not present any evidence.

Supporting Evidence

No evidence adduced. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammedali
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pathummabi KK
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kadheeja MV
Party Age: 63
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nabeesa Beebi KK
Party Age: 61
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jameela KK
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fasila
Party Age: 28
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.N Shamsudhin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.Abija PA
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K Alikoya
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Nadeem Muhammed
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence: