Case Summary
This case involves Musthafa as the plaintiff and Junaid and Jency as the defendants regarding an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff. No instructions were provided by counsel for the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raziya
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- sister
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Junaid
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jency
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit for injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Musthafa vs Junaid, Jency regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Musthafa vs Junaid, Jency regarding injunction