Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.112/2025

Case between Musthafa V. vs Pradeep P. V. regarding rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Musthafa V. is the plaintiff seeking the recovery of rent arrears from the defendant, Pradeep P. V. The court considered the evidence and found in part for the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed in part, requiring the defendant to deposit the rent arrears. The defendant admitted to being a tenant and acknowledged the rent amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to deposit the rent arrears in cost within 10 days.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed in part, requiring the defendant to deposit the rent arrears. The defendant admitted to being a tenant and acknowledged the rent amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant had no evidence to prove payment of rent and admitted to being a tenant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant had no evidence to prove payment of rent and admitted to being a tenant.
Supporting Evidence
There is no receipt showing payment of rent amount.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed in part. Defendant has no case that he had paid rent. He also admitted to be tenant of the landlord. Hence petition allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Musthafa V.
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep P. V.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NIL
Defendants Documents
NIL

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. K. Jayapalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. A. Anas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Liji Esahak
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. G. Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramya Velayudhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant is ordered to deposit the rent arrears with costs within 10 days.
Evidence:
Petition allowed in part. Defendant has no case that he had paid rent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Musthafa V. vs Pradeep P. V. regarding rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Musthafa V. vs Pradeep P. V. regarding rent arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won