Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.112/2025

Case between Musthafa V. vs Pradeep P. V. regarding rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Musthafa V. is the plaintiff seeking the recovery of rent arrears from the defendant, Pradeep P. V. The court considered the evidence and found in part for the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed in part, requiring the defendant to deposit the rent arrears. The defendant admitted to being a tenant and acknowledged the rent amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to deposit the rent arrears in cost within 10 days.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant had no evidence to prove payment of rent and admitted to being a tenant.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed in part. Defendant has no case that he had paid rent. He also admitted to be tenant of the landlord. Hence petition allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Musthafa V. (Age not specified years) XV/562 C, Chembarakky, Marampilly P O, Vazhakkulam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Pradeep P. V. (55 years years) Pulliyil House, Chembarakky, South Vazhakkulam Kara, Vazhakkulam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant is ordered to deposit the rent arrears with costs within 10 days.
Evidence:
Petition allowed in part. Defendant has no case that he had paid rent.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases