Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff, Murukan, for the realisation of money. The defendants include Indu Bai and others.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff remained absent without any representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not present any case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not present any case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
As the plaintiff remained absent and no representation as well.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Murukan
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indu Bai
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gautam Rajesh Jain
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seethal
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thattamala S.Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thrideepkumar.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Claim for realization of money.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent and no representation as well. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Murukan vs Indu Bai et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Murukan vs Indu Bai et al regarding Realisation of Money