Case Summary
Murali is the plaintiff in this case against Sabitha Ramachandran and others regarding the rejection of the suit due to absence and non-remittance of court fees. The court dismissed the suit based on procedural grounds.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fees.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Murali (59 years years)
Kannimolathu House, Mudakkuzha P O, Akanadu Kara, Vengoor west Village, Kunnathubadu Taluk
Defendants
Sabitha Ramachandran (66 years years)
Kaippilly House, Near Ayyappankavu, Thrikkanarvattom Desom, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannoor Taluk
Narayanan (90 years years)
Kannimolathu House, Mudakkuzha P O, Akanadu Kara, Vengoor west village, Kunnathubadu Taluk
Binulal (25 years years)
Kannimolathu House, Mudakkuzha P O, Akanadu Kara, Vengoor west Village, Kunnathubadu Taluk
Sulochana Shaji (50 years years)
Kannimolathu House, Mudakkuzha P O, Akanadu Kara, Vengoor west Village, Kunnathubadu Taluk
Anju (29 years years)
Mullassery House, Kodanadu P O, Kodanadu pallippady Desom, Kodanadu Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.