Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 181 OF 2016

Case between Muhammed vs Parakkadan Hamza regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed filed a suit against Parakkadan Hamza seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The court found that there was no necessity to proceed with the suit as related eviction proceedings were ongoing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as there was no necessity to proceed with it due to ongoing eviction proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined there was no necessity to proceed with the suit due to the filing of related eviction proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed (52 years) Paruthikalayil House, Kattiparuthi amsom, desom, Valanchery Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 552.

Defendants

Parakkadan Hamza (60 years) Vadakumbram amsom, desom, & Post, Pin: 676 556, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed.
Evidence:
As R.C.P. 78/2015 is filed for lawful eviction there is no necessity to proceed with this suit. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases