Case Summary
Muhammed is the plaintiff in this case against Abdul Gafoor regarding the recovery of a debt. The defendant was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to the balance court fee not being paid.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Gafoor
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee documents.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit for realisation money.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not paid. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Gafoor regarding realisation money
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Gafoor regarding realisation money