Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 835/2023

Case between Muhammed Sherin vs Rejeena et al regarding Realisation of Money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Muhammed Sherin, is seeking to recover money from the defendants, Rejeena and Fathima Beevi. The suit was filed under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee. Consequently, the suit was rejected under the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee. Consequently, the suit was rejected under the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee, leading to rejection of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee, leading to rejection of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaintiff's suit is rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Sherin
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rejeena
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima Beevi
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Muraleedharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The court rejected the suit as the plaintiff did not remit the Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not remitted Balance Court Fee so far. Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Sherin vs Rejeena et al regarding Realisation of Money.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Sherin vs Rejeena et al regarding Realisation of Money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Indian Overseas Bank, Chemmakkad vs Sunil.L.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Shamsudeen vs Sreedharan Pillai regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ajas Basheer vs Lekha.T regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won